Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 7 2700E 8-core 2.8 GHz Socket 0 45W Desktop Processor Intel i3-6300 2-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1151 51W Desktop Processor

3.7/10 Score 2684
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E 8-core 2.8 GHz Socket 0 45W Desktop Processor
2.8/10 Score 2057
Intel i3-6300 2-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1151 51W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 140
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

26% higher

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
100% higher

4 GHz

0 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

4 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
22% faster

43.7 GB/s

34.1 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

6

Socket

0

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
12% lower

45 Watts

51 Watts

Recommended
3.7/10 Score 2684
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E 8-core 2.8 GHz Socket 0 45W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E 8-core 2.8 GHz Socket 0 45W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
CPU Architecture 12 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% bigger
Cores 8 vs 2 (6) 75% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 4 (12) 75% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4 GHz vs 0 GHz Turbo clock speed is (4GHz) 100% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 4 MB (12MB) 75% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 43.7 GB/s vs 34.1 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (9.6GB/s) 22% faster
Thermal Design Power 45 Watts vs 51 Watts Power consumption is (6Watts) 12% lower
CONS 1
CPU Clock 2.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Clock speed is (1GHz) 26% lower
2nd Choice
2.8/10 Score 2057
Intel i3-6300 2-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1151 51W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-6300 2-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1151 51W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-9400F Intel i5-9400F
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-4590 Intel i5-4590
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i7-3770S Intel i7-3770S
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i9-9900KF Intel i9-9900KF
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-11400 Intel i5-11400
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-7400T Intel i5-7400T
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-3470S Intel i5-3470S
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i5-3470T Intel i5-3470T
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
Intel i9-10980XE Intel i9-10980XE
vs