Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i5-11600K 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor

3.7/10 Score 2688
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600K 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 250
$ 250
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

8

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

16

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.2 GHz

18% higher

3.9 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4.1 GHz

16% higher

4.9 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

12 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

43.7 GB/s

13% faster

50 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

11

Socket

0

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
48% lower

65 Watts

125 Watts

Recommended
4.7/10 Score 3480
Intel i5-11600K 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-11600K 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
CPU Clock 3.9 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 18% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.9 GHz vs 4.1 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 16% higher
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (6.3GB/s) 13% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 5
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
Cores 6 vs 8 (2) 25% less physical cores
Threads 12 vs 16 (4) 25% less logical cores
Cache 12 MB vs 16 MB (4MB) 25% smaller processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
3.7/10 Score 2688
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
vs
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
Intel i7-4771 Intel i7-4771
vs
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
vs
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
vs
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE
vs
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
Intel i7-6850K Intel i7-6850K
vs
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
Intel i3-4150 Intel i3-4150
vs
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
Intel i5-3550 Intel i5-3550
vs
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
AMD Ryzen 2970WX AMD Ryzen 2970WX
vs
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
Intel i5-10400T Intel i5-10400T
vs