Close window
PREMIUM
- Support Cudasteam
- No Ads
-
-
1-week Premium 200 Cuda Coins$4.99
-
1-month Premium 350 Cuda Coins$9.99
-
3-month Premium 500 Cuda Coins$6 / month 40% discount
-
12-month Premium 1000 Cuda Coins$4 / month 60% discount
Continue -
Compare
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 8-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
3.6/10
Score
2607
3.6/10
Score
2674
$
350
$
440
Share with friends
Copy link
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Visual view
Simple view
CPU Architecture
The smaller CPU, the better performance
14 nm
22 nm
Cores
The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time
8
6
Threads
Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking
16
12
CPU Clock
The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
3% higher
3.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
CPU Turbo Clock
CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
5% higher
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Cache
CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution
16 MB
15 MB
DDR3
Type of memory CPU supports
No
No
DDR4
Type of memory CPU supports
Yes
Yes
Memory Bandwidth
The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
39.7 GB/s
42% faster
68 GB/s
Maximum Memory
The maximum amount of memory CPU can support
64 GB
64 GB
Generation
0
5
Socket
0
2011
Thermal Design Power
Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
32% lower
95 Watts
140 Watts
Recommended
3.6/10
Score
2607
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 8-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
PROS 7
| CPU Architecture | 14 nm vs 22 nm | CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger |
|---|---|---|
| Cores | 8 vs 6 | (2) 25% more physical cores |
| Threads | 16 vs 12 | (4) 25% more logical cores |
| CPU Clock | 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz | Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher |
| CPU Turbo Clock | 3.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz | Turbo clock speed is (0.2GHz) 5% higher |
| Cache | 16 MB vs 15 MB | (1MB) 6% bigger processor cache memory |
| Thermal Design Power | 95 Watts vs 140 Watts | Power consumption is (45Watts) 32% lower |
CONS 1
| Memory Bandwidth | 39.7 GB/s vs 68 GB/s | Memory bandwidth is (28.3GB/s) 42% slower |
|---|
2nd Choice
3.6/10
Score
2674
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
You might also like
Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
-
4.9/10Score 3588Intel i9-11900T 8-core 1.5 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
-
4.9/10Score 3575
Intel i7-10700 8-core 2.9 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
$320Where to buy? -
4.9/10Score 3575
Intel i7-11700T 8-core 1.4 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
-
4.9/10Score 3571
Intel i7-10700K 8-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
$400Where to buy? -
-
4.8/10Score 3531
Intel i9-9900KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
$502Where to buy? -
4.8/10Score 3521
Intel i9-9900KS 8-core 4 GHz Socket 1151 127W Desktop Processor
$544Where to buy? -
4.8/10Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
-
4.8/10Score 3492
Intel i7-10700T 8-core 2 GHz Socket 1200 35W Desktop Processor
-
4.7/10Score 3480Intel i5-11600KF 6-core 3.9 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel i7-11700F
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel i9-11900
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel i9-9900K
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel i5-11400
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel i5-3470
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel i5-3475S
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel i3-10300
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Intel i5-8600
vs