Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2610
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 119
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
3% higher

3.4 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
8% higher

3.9 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

43.7 GB/s

36% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

5

Socket

0

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
54% lower

65 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
3.6/10 Score 2610
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
CPU Architecture 12 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (10nm) 45% bigger
CPU Clock 3.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 3.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 15 MB (1MB) 6% bigger processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 1
Memory Bandwidth 43.7 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (24.3GB/s) 36% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i7-6700T Intel i7-6700T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i5-6400T Intel i5-6400T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i7-4770K Intel i7-4770K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i7-4770S Intel i7-4770S
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i3-4330T Intel i3-4330T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i3-6300T Intel i3-6300T
vs