Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 8-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2610
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2607
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 8-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 119
$ 350
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.4 GHz

3.4 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
3% higher

3.9 GHz

3.8 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

16 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
9% faster

43.7 GB/s

39.7 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

0

Socket

0

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
32% lower

65 Watts

95 Watts

Recommended
3.6/10 Score 2610
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
CPU Architecture 12 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% bigger
CPU Turbo Clock 3.9 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
Memory Bandwidth 43.7 GB/s vs 39.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (4GB/s) 9% faster
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 95 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 32% lower
CONS 2
Cores 6 vs 8 (2) 25% less physical cores
Threads 12 vs 16 (4) 25% less logical cores
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2607
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 8-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X 8-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i9-11900K Intel i9-11900K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i5-11500T Intel i5-11500T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i5-4690T Intel i5-4690T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i5-11400F Intel i5-11400F
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i7-8700T Intel i7-8700T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i3-9320 Intel i3-9320
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Ryzen 3970X AMD Ryzen 3970X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i5-6500T Intel i5-6500T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i5-3570S Intel i5-3570S
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel i5-4690T Intel i5-4690T
vs