Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor

3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
42% higher

3.6 GHz

2.1 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4 GHz

9% higher

4.4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

8 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
5% faster

43.7 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

9

Socket

0

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

46% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
4.8/10 Score 3495
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-9900T 8-core 2.1 GHz Socket 1151 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 8 (8) 50% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.4 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.4GHz) 9% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 8 MB (8MB) 50% bigger processor cache memory
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 35 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% lower
CONS 3
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
CPU Clock 2.1 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (1.5GHz) 42% lower
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (2.1GB/s) 5% slower
2nd Choice
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i3-3245 Intel i3-3245
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i3-4150 Intel i3-4150
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i3-10300T Intel i3-10300T
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
AMD Ryzen 2990WX AMD Ryzen 2990WX
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i5-11500 Intel i5-11500
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i3-10320 Intel i3-10320
vs
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
Intel i5-3570S Intel i5-3570S
vs