Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
4.9/10 Score 3620
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
31% higher

3.6 GHz

2.5 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4 GHz

23% higher

5.2 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

8 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

43.7 GB/s

13% faster

50 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

11

Socket

0

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

65 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3620
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-11900F 8-core 2.5 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 8 (8) 50% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.2GHz) 23% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 8 MB (8MB) 50% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (6.3GB/s) 13% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 2
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
CPU Clock 2.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (1.1GHz) 31% lower
2nd Choice
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i5-10500T Intel i5-10500T
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i7-4770 Intel i7-4770
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i3-9300T Intel i3-9300T
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i3-3210 Intel i3-3210
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i3-10100T Intel i3-10100T
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X AMD Ryzen 5 1500X
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
Intel i3-7320 Intel i3-7320
vs