Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-11700KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor

3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
4.9/10 Score 3615
Intel i7-11700KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.6 GHz

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4 GHz

20% higher

5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

8 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

43.7 GB/s

13% faster

50 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

11

Socket

0

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
48% lower

65 Watts

125 Watts

Recommended
4.9/10 Score 3615
Intel i7-11700KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-11700KF 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1200 125W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
Cores 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more physical cores
Threads 16 vs 8 (8) 50% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1GHz) 20% higher
Cache 16 MB vs 8 MB (8MB) 50% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 50 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (6.3GB/s) 13% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 2
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
Thermal Design Power 125 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (60Watts) 48% higher
2nd Choice
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i3-6098P Intel i3-6098P
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i7-6900K Intel i7-6900K
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i5-7600K Intel i5-7600K
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i5-7400 Intel i5-7400
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i5-4430 Intel i5-4430
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i3-3250 Intel i3-3250
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i7-8700 Intel i7-8700
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i9-10900T Intel i9-10900T
vs
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
vs