Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor

6.2/10 Score 4519
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
5.9/10 Score 4297
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 600
$ 580
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

16

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

32

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.4 GHz

8% higher

3.7 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4 GHz

11% higher

4.5 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

32 MB

19 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

79.4 GB/s

16% faster

94 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

2048 GB

256 GB

Generation

0

10

Socket

0

2066

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

180 Watts

8% lower

165 Watts

Recommended
5.9/10 Score 4297
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900X 10-core 3.7 GHz Socket 2066 165W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.5 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.5GHz) 11% higher
Memory Bandwidth 94 GB/s vs 79.4 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (14.6GB/s) 16% faster
Thermal Design Power 165 Watts vs 180 Watts Power consumption is (15Watts) 8% lower
CONS 4
Cores 10 vs 16 (6) 38% less physical cores
Threads 20 vs 32 (12) 38% less logical cores
Cache 19 MB vs 32 MB (13MB) 41% smaller processor cache memory
Maximum Memory 256 GB vs 2048 GB Maximium memory is (1792GB) 88% less
2nd Choice
6.2/10 Score 4519
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-7600T Intel i5-7600T
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-9600 Intel i5-9600
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i9-11900T Intel i9-11900T
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i7-8086K Intel i7-8086K
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-3470 Intel i5-3470
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE AMD Ryzen 5 3400GE
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-3570 Intel i5-3570
vs
Intel i9-10900X Intel i9-10900X
Intel i5-4690T Intel i5-4690T
vs