Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

6.2/10 Score 4519
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 600
$ 1000
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

16

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

32

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
6% higher

3.4 GHz

3.2 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
8% higher

4 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

32 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
3% faster

79.4 GB/s

76.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

2048 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

6

Socket

0

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

180 Watts

22% lower

140 Watts

Recommended
6.2/10 Score 4519
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 1950X 16-core 3.4 GHz Socket 0 180W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
Cores 16 vs 8 (8) 50% more physical cores
Threads 32 vs 16 (16) 50% more logical cores
CPU Clock 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Clock speed is (0.2GHz) 6% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% higher
Cache 32 MB vs 20 MB (12MB) 38% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 79.4 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (2.6GB/s) 3% faster
Maximum Memory 2048 GB vs 128 GB Maximium memory is (1920GB) 94% more
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 180 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (40Watts) 22% higher
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-6400T Intel i5-6400T
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-10600K Intel i5-10600K
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-11500T Intel i5-11500T
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-11400T Intel i5-11400T
vs
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
Intel i5-8600T Intel i5-8600T
vs