Search
Compare

Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card

5.2/10 Score 6081
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
2.7/10 Score 3185
AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 180
$ 180
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

14 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

4096

2304

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

1000 MHz

32% higher

1469 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

1000 MHz

35% higher

1545 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

4 GB

8 GB

Memory Type

HBM

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

1 Gbps

88% higher

8 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

4096 bit

256 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM
50% higher

512 GB/s

256 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

256

144

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

64

32

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second
23% higher

64 GP/s

49 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second
13% higher

256 GT/s

223 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

8 Flop/s

7 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

194 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

175 Watts

175 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

53 fps

10% higher

59 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
11% higher

47 fps

42 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

51 fps

6% higher

54 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

45 fps

20% higher

56 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

46 fps

38% higher

74 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

49 fps

13% higher

56 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p
32% higher

41 fps

28 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

50 fps

19% higher

62 fps

Recommended
2.7/10 Score 3185
AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 11
GPU Architecture 14 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (14nm) 50% smaller
GPU Clock 1469 MHz vs 1000 MHz Clock speed is (469MHz) 32% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1545 MHz vs 1000 MHz Boost clock speed is (545MHz) 35% higher
Memory Capacity 8 GB vs 4 GB (4GB) 50% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 8 Gbps vs 1 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (7Gbps) 88% faster
Rise of the Tomb Raider 59 fps vs 53 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (6fps) 10% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 54 fps vs 51 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (3fps) 6% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 56 fps vs 45 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (11fps) 20% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 74 fps vs 46 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (28fps) 38% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 56 fps vs 49 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (7fps) 13% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 62 fps vs 50 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (12fps) 19% more frames per second
CONS 9
Shading Units 2304 vs 4096 (1792) 44% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth 256 GB/s vs 512 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (256GB/s) 50% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 144 vs 256 (112) 44% less Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP) 32 vs 64 (32) 50% less Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 49 GP/s vs 64 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (15GP/s) 23% slower
Texture Fill Rate 223 GT/s vs 256 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (33GT/s) 13% slower
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 8 Flop/s (1Flop/s) 13% less Floating Point Operations per minute
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42 fps vs 47 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (5fps) 11% less frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 28 fps vs 41 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (13fps) 32% less frames per second
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 6081
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia Turbo 1060 Nvidia Turbo 1060
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Radeon R9 FURY Radeon R9 FURY
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia Rog Strix 1080 Nvidia Rog Strix 1080
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Radeon R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 760 Nvidia GTX 760
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia EVGA GTX 1070 Nvidia EVGA GTX 1070
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Radeon R9 390X Radeon R9 390X
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 980 Ti Nvidia GTX 980 Ti
vs