Search
Compare

Nvidia GTX 1660 6GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card

3/10 Score 3457
Nvidia GTX 1660 6GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card
2.7/10 Score 3185
AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 249
$ 180
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

1408

2304

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second
4% higher

1530 MHz

1469 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance
13% higher

1785 MHz

1545 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

6 GB

8 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

8 Gbps

8 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

192 bit

256 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

192 GB/s

25% higher

256 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

88

144

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

48

32

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second
43% higher

86 GP/s

49 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

157 GT/s

30% higher

223 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

5 Flop/s

7 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

203 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board
31% lower

120 Watts

175 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

58 fps

2% higher

59 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
7% higher

45 fps

42 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

51 fps

6% higher

54 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p
3% higher

58 fps

56 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

74 fps

74 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

55 fps

2% higher

56 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p
20% higher

35 fps

28 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

52 fps

16% higher

62 fps

Recommended
2.7/10 Score 3185
AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
AMD RX 590 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 10
Shading Units 2304 vs 1408 (896) 39% more Shader Processing Units
Memory Capacity 8 GB vs 6 GB (2GB) 25% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Bandwidth 256 GB/s vs 192 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (64GB/s) 25% faster
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 144 vs 88 (56) 39% more Texture Mapping Units
Texture Fill Rate 223 GT/s vs 157 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (66GT/s) 30% faster
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 5 Flop/s (2Flop/s) 29% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Rise of the Tomb Raider 59 fps vs 58 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (1fps) 2% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 54 fps vs 51 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (3fps) 6% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 56 fps vs 55 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (1fps) 2% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 62 fps vs 52 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (10fps) 16% more frames per second
CONS 9
GPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm GPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% bigger
GPU Clock 1469 MHz vs 1530 MHz Clock speed is (61MHz) 4% lower
GPU Boost Clock 1545 MHz vs 1785 MHz Boost clock speed is (240MHz) 13% lower
Render Output Unit (ROP) 32 vs 48 (16) 33% less Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 49 GP/s vs 86 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (37GP/s) 43% slower
Graphics Card Power 175 Watts vs 120 Watts Power consumption is (55Watts) 31% higher
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 42 fps vs 45 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (3fps) 7% less frames per second
Metro Exodus 56 fps vs 58 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (2fps) 3% less frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 28 fps vs 35 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (7fps) 20% less frames per second
2nd Choice
3/10 Score 3457
Nvidia GTX 1660 6GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX 1660 6GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia TITAN Xp Nvidia TITAN Xp
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia TITAN RTX Nvidia TITAN RTX
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 1660 SUPER Nvidia GTX 1660 SUPER
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 780 Nvidia GTX 780
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
AMD RX Vega 56 AMD RX Vega 56
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 1650 SUPER Nvidia GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia MSI Armor 1060 Nvidia MSI Armor 1060
vs
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
Nvidia GTX 750 Nvidia GTX 750
vs