Compare

Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card Radeon R9 285 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 190W Desktop Graphic card

2.4/10 Score 2793

1.6/10 Score 1904

Radeon R9 285 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 190W Desktop Graphic card

$ 150

$ 160

Compare

Share with friends

Copy link

Facebook

Twitter

Navigation Compare navigation

Left Won
Draw
Left Lost

GPU Architecture Shading Units GPU Clock GPU Boost Clock Memory Capacity Memory Type Memory Speed Memory Bus Width Memory Bandwidth Texture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill Rate Texture Fill Rate Floating Point Per Second DirectX OpenGL Max GPU Temprature Graphics Card Power Rise of the Tomb Raider Shadow of the Tomb Raider The Witcher 3 Metro Exodus Battlefield 1 Far Cry 5 Assassin's Creed Unity Resident Evil 2

Go to Results

Visual view Simple view

GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

12 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

896

1792

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

38% higher

1485 MHz

918 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

45% higher

1665 MHz

918 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

4 GB

2 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

25% higher

8 Gbps

6 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

128 bit

256 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

128 GB/s

27% higher

176 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

112

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

45% higher

53 GP/s

29 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

93 GT/s

10% higher

103 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

3 Flop/s

DirectX

OpenGL

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

203 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

61% lower

75 Watts

190 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

51% higher

47 fps

23 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

38 fps

5% higher

40 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

23% higher

39 fps

30 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

21% higher

38 fps

30 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

11% higher

35 fps

31 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

33% higher

39 fps

26 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

32% higher

37 fps

25 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

22% higher

36 fps

28 fps

Recommended

2.4/10 Score 2793

Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card

Benchmark

Full specs

Compatible

To build

PROS 14

GPU Architecture	12 nm vs 28 nm	GPU architecture size is (16nm) 57% smaller
GPU Clock	1485 MHz vs 918 MHz	Clock speed is (567MHz) 38% higher
GPU Boost Clock	1665 MHz vs 918 MHz	Boost clock speed is (747MHz) 45% higher
Memory Capacity	4 GB vs 2 GB	(2GB) 50% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed	8 Gbps vs 6 Gbps	Transfer speed of the memory is (2Gbps) 25% faster
Pixel Fill Rate	53 GP/s vs 29 GP/s	Pixel Fill Rate is (24GP/s) 45% faster
Graphics Card Power	75 Watts vs 190 Watts	Power consumption is (115Watts) 61% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider	47 fps vs 23 fps	Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (24fps) 51% more frames per second
The Witcher 3	39 fps vs 30 fps	The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (9fps) 23% more frames per second
Metro Exodus	38 fps vs 30 fps	Metro Exodus - 1440p: (8fps) 21% more frames per second
Battlefield 1	35 fps vs 31 fps	Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (4fps) 11% more frames per second
Far Cry 5	39 fps vs 26 fps	Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (13fps) 33% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity	37 fps vs 25 fps	Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (12fps) 32% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2	36 fps vs 28 fps	Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (8fps) 22% more frames per second

CONS 5

Shading Units	896 vs 1792	(896) 50% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth	128 GB/s vs 176 GB/s	Memory bandwidth is (48GB/s) 27% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU)	56 vs 112	(56) 50% less Texture Mapping Units
Texture Fill Rate	93 GT/s vs 103 GT/s	Texel Fill Rate is (10GT/s) 10% slower
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	38 fps vs 40 fps	Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (2fps) 5% less frames per second

2nd Choice

1.6/10 Score 1904

Radeon R9 285 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 190W Desktop Graphic card

Benchmark

Full specs

Compatible

To build

You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side

3.3/10

Score 3785

Nvidia GTX 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

$640
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.3/10

Score 3785

Nvidia EVGA GTX 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

$600
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3768

Nvidia EVGA GTX 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3768

Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3762

Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER 8GB 14Gbps 256-bit 160W Desktop Graphic card

$410
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3749

AMD RX 5700 8GB 14Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

$358
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3709

Nvidia Windforce 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.2/10

Score 3687

Nvidia RTX 2060 6GB 14Gbps 192-bit 160W Desktop Graphic card

$410
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.1/10

Score 3614

Nvidia GTX 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs
3.1/10

Score 3614

Nvidia Dual 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

$400
Where to buy?

Benchmark
Full specs