Search
Compare

Intel i5-9600KF 6-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.5/10 Score 3273
Intel i5-9600KF 6-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 207
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

6

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
11% higher

3.7 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
22% higher

4.6 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

9 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

39% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

9

5

Socket

1151

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
32% lower

95 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
4.5/10 Score 3273
Intel i5-9600KF 6-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-9600KF 6-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.4GHz) 11% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1GHz) 22% higher
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (45Watts) 32% lower
CONS 3
Threads 6 vs 12 (6) 50% less logical cores
Cache 9 MB vs 15 MB (6MB) 40% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i3-6320 Intel i3-6320
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i3-4170 Intel i3-4170
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i7-11700F Intel i7-11700F
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i5-6500T Intel i5-6500T
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
AMD Ryzen 1950X AMD Ryzen 1950X
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i7-4790 Intel i7-4790
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i3-4340 Intel i3-4340
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i3-7300T Intel i3-7300T
vs