Search
Compare

Intel i5-9500F 6-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

4.4/10 Score 3260
Intel i5-9500F 6-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 271
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

6

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3 GHz

9% higher

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
18% higher

4.4 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

9 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

41.6 GB/s

39% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

64 GB

Generation

9

5

Socket

1151

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
54% lower

65 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
4.4/10 Score 3260
Intel i5-9500F 6-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-9500F 6-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
CPU Turbo Clock 4.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 18% higher
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 4
Threads 6 vs 12 (6) 50% less logical cores
CPU Clock 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 9% lower
Cache 9 MB vs 15 MB (6MB) 40% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i3-4170 Intel i3-4170
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i3-7300 Intel i3-7300
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
AMD Ryzen 1900X AMD Ryzen 1900X
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i3-4150 Intel i3-4150
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i3-10100 Intel i3-10100
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i5-4590S Intel i5-4590S
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
AMD Ryzen 7 2700E AMD Ryzen 7 2700E
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i3-8300T Intel i3-8300T
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i5-8500 Intel i5-8500
vs