Search
Compare

Intel i5-9500F 6-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor Intel i3-4160 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor

4.4/10 Score 3260
Intel i5-9500F 6-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
1.9/10 Score 1409
Intel i3-4160 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 271
$ 110
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

6

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3 GHz

17% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
18% higher

4.4 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

9 MB

3 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
38% faster

41.6 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

32 GB

Generation

9

4

Socket

1151

1150

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

17% lower

54 Watts

Recommended
4.4/10 Score 3260
Intel i5-9500F 6-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-9500F 6-core 3 GHz Socket 1151 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 7
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
Cores 6 vs 2 (4) 67% more physical cores
Threads 6 vs 4 (2) 33% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 18% higher
Cache 9 MB vs 3 MB (6MB) 67% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 25.6 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (16GB/s) 38% faster
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 32 GB Maximium memory is (96GB) 75% more
CONS 2
CPU Clock 3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.6GHz) 17% lower
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 54 Watts Power consumption is (11Watts) 17% higher
2nd Choice
1.9/10 Score 1409
Intel i3-4160 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-4160 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i5-3330S Intel i5-3330S
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i5-8500T Intel i5-8500T
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i7-4770 Intel i7-4770
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i9-11900T Intel i9-11900T
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i7-7700K Intel i7-7700K
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i5-4590T Intel i5-4590T
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i7-6850K Intel i7-6850K
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i7-4771 Intel i7-4771
vs
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
vs