Search
Compare

Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-4785T 4-core 2.2 GHz Socket 1150 35W Desktop Processor

2/10 Score 1434
Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor
2.1/10 Score 1507
Intel i7-4785T 4-core 2.2 GHz Socket 1150 35W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 290
$ 790
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

4

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
29% higher

3.1 GHz

2.2 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
11% higher

3.6 GHz

3.2 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

4 MB

8 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

25.6 GB/s

25.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

32 GB

32 GB

Generation

5

4

Socket

1150

1150

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

46% lower

35 Watts

Recommended
2/10 Score 1434
Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-5675C 4-core 3.1 GHz Socket 1150 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 3
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
CPU Clock 3.1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz Clock speed is (0.9GHz) 29% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.4GHz) 11% higher
CONS 3
Threads 4 vs 8 (4) 50% less logical cores
Cache 4 MB vs 8 MB (4MB) 50% smaller processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 35 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 46% higher
2nd Choice
2.1/10 Score 1507
Intel i7-4785T 4-core 2.2 GHz Socket 1150 35W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-4785T 4-core 2.2 GHz Socket 1150 35W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
Intel i5-9500F Intel i5-9500F
vs
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
Intel i5-11400T Intel i5-11400T
vs
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
Intel i5-6600K Intel i5-6600K
vs
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
vs
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
Intel i5-6500T Intel i5-6500T
vs
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
Intel i5-8600 Intel i5-8600
vs
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
Intel i3-7300T Intel i3-7300T
vs
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
AMD Ryzen 2920X AMD Ryzen 2920X
vs
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
Intel i7-8700 Intel i7-8700
vs
Intel i5-5675C Intel i5-5675C
Intel i5-11500T Intel i5-11500T
vs