Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i5-9600KF 6-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor

3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
4.5/10 Score 3273
Intel i5-9600KF 6-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 207
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

6

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.6 GHz

3% higher

3.7 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4 GHz

13% higher

4.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

8 MB

9 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
5% faster

43.7 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

0

9

Socket

0

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
32% lower

65 Watts

95 Watts

Recommended
4.5/10 Score 3273
Intel i5-9600KF 6-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i5-9600KF 6-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 6 vs 4 (2) 33% more physical cores
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.1GHz) 3% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.6 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.6GHz) 13% higher
Cache 9 MB vs 8 MB (1MB) 11% bigger processor cache memory
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
Threads 6 vs 8 (2) 25% less logical cores
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (2.1GB/s) 5% slower
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (30Watts) 32% higher
2nd Choice
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i9-9900KS Intel i9-9900KS
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i3-9100T Intel i3-9100T
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i5-8400T Intel i5-8400T
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i7-8700K Intel i7-8700K
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i3-4350 Intel i3-4350
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i5-3450S Intel i5-3450S
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE AMD Ryzen 3 2200GE
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i3-7101TE Intel i3-7101TE
vs
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
Intel i3-9100F Intel i3-9100F
vs