Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i3-6300 2-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1151 51W Desktop Processor

3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
2.8/10 Score 2057
Intel i3-6300 2-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1151 51W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 140
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.6 GHz

5% higher

3.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
100% higher

4 GHz

0 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

8 MB

4 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
22% faster

43.7 GB/s

34.1 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

6

Socket

0

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

22% lower

51 Watts

Recommended
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
CPU Architecture 12 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% bigger
Cores 4 vs 2 (2) 50% more physical cores
Threads 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4 GHz vs 0 GHz Turbo clock speed is (4GHz) 100% higher
Cache 8 MB vs 4 MB (4MB) 50% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 43.7 GB/s vs 34.1 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (9.6GB/s) 22% faster
CONS 2
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz Clock speed is (0.2GHz) 5% lower
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 51 Watts Power consumption is (14Watts) 22% higher
2nd Choice
2.8/10 Score 2057
Intel i3-6300 2-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1151 51W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-6300 2-core 3.8 GHz Socket 1151 51W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE AMD Ryzen 5 2400GE
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i7-9700F Intel i7-9700F
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i9-11900KF Intel i9-11900KF
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
AMD Ryzen 2990WX AMD Ryzen 2990WX
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i5-10600T Intel i5-10600T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i7-6850K Intel i7-6850K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i3-7101TE Intel i3-7101TE
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i5-8400T Intel i5-8400T
vs