Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i3-6098P 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 54W Desktop Processor

3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
2.8/10 Score 2027
Intel i3-6098P 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 54W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 120
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

2

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

4

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.6 GHz

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
100% higher

4 GHz

0 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

8 MB

3 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
22% faster

43.7 GB/s

34.1 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

6

Socket

0

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

17% lower

54 Watts

Recommended
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 6
CPU Architecture 12 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% bigger
Cores 4 vs 2 (2) 50% more physical cores
Threads 8 vs 4 (4) 50% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4 GHz vs 0 GHz Turbo clock speed is (4GHz) 100% higher
Cache 8 MB vs 3 MB (5MB) 63% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 43.7 GB/s vs 34.1 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (9.6GB/s) 22% faster
CONS 1
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 54 Watts Power consumption is (11Watts) 17% higher
2nd Choice
2.8/10 Score 2027
Intel i3-6098P 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 54W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-6098P 2-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 54W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i7-8700 Intel i7-8700
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i7-9700T Intel i7-9700T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i3-4370 Intel i3-4370
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i9-11900T Intel i9-11900T
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i7-4770 Intel i7-4770
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i5-3475S Intel i5-3475S
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i7-4790K Intel i7-4790K
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i5-10600 Intel i5-10600
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i3-8300 Intel i3-8300
vs
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel i5-9400 Intel i5-9400
vs