Search
Compare

Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card Radeon R9 270 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

4.2/10 Score 3768
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
2.1/10 Score 1864
Radeon R9 270 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 400
$ 100
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

16 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

1920

1280

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second
44% higher

1607 MHz

900 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance
49% higher

1797 MHz

925 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

8 GB

2 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data
25% higher

8 Gbps

6 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

256 bit

256 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM
30% higher

256 GB/s

179 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

120

80

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

64

32

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second
74% higher

115 GP/s

30 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second
66% higher

216 GT/s

74 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

7 Flop/s

2 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

201 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

150 Watts

150 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
58% higher

72 fps

30 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
48% higher

52 fps

27 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p
65% higher

68 fps

24 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p
60% higher

70 fps

28 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p
67% higher

83 fps

27 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p
63% higher

67 fps

25 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p
32% higher

37 fps

25 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p
55% higher

66 fps

30 fps

Recommended
4.2/10 Score 3768
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 20
GPU Architecture 16 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (12nm) 43% smaller
Shading Units 1920 vs 1280 (640) 33% more Shader Processing Units
GPU Clock 1607 MHz vs 900 MHz Clock speed is (707MHz) 44% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1797 MHz vs 925 MHz Boost clock speed is (872MHz) 49% higher
Memory Capacity 8 GB vs 2 GB (6GB) 75% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 8 Gbps vs 6 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (2Gbps) 25% faster
Memory Bandwidth 256 GB/s vs 179 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (77GB/s) 30% faster
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 120 vs 80 (40) 33% more Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP) 64 vs 32 (32) 50% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 115 GP/s vs 30 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (85GP/s) 74% faster
Texture Fill Rate 216 GT/s vs 74 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (142GT/s) 66% faster
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 2 Flop/s (5Flop/s) 71% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Rise of the Tomb Raider 72 fps vs 30 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (42fps) 58% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52 fps vs 27 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (25fps) 48% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 68 fps vs 24 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (44fps) 65% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 70 fps vs 28 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (42fps) 60% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 83 fps vs 27 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (56fps) 67% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 67 fps vs 25 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (42fps) 63% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 37 fps vs 25 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (12fps) 32% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 66 fps vs 30 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (36fps) 55% more frames per second
2nd Choice
2.1/10 Score 1864
Radeon R9 270 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 270 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Radeon R9 NANO Radeon R9 NANO
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
AMD RX Vega 64 AMD RX Vega 64
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia GTX 960 Nvidia GTX 960
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia Windforce 1080 Nvidia Windforce 1080
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia GTX Titan Black Nvidia GTX Titan Black
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti Nvidia GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Radeon R9 290X Radeon R9 290X
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
vs