Search
Compare

Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card Nvidia GTX 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

6.9/10 Score 6081
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
4.3/10 Score 3785
Nvidia GTX 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 180
$ 640
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

16 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

4096

2560

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

1000 MHz

38% higher

1607 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

1000 MHz

42% higher

1733 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

4 GB

8 GB

Memory Type

HBM

GDDR5X

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

1 Gbps

90% higher

10 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

4096 bit

256 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM
38% higher

512 GB/s

320 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

256

160

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

64

64

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

64 GP/s

42% higher

111 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

256 GT/s

8% higher

277 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

8 Flop/s

9 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

194 °F

201 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board
3% lower

175 Watts

180 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

53 fps

42% higher

92 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

47 fps

28% higher

65 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

51 fps

46% higher

94 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

45 fps

53% higher

96 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

46 fps

55% higher

102 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

49 fps

40% higher

82 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

41 fps

40% higher

68 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

50 fps

38% higher

81 fps

Recommended
4.3/10 Score 3785
Nvidia GTX 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 16
GPU Architecture 16 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (12nm) 43% smaller
GPU Clock 1607 MHz vs 1000 MHz Clock speed is (607MHz) 38% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1733 MHz vs 1000 MHz Boost clock speed is (733MHz) 42% higher
Memory Capacity 8 GB vs 4 GB (4GB) 50% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 10 Gbps vs 1 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (9Gbps) 90% faster
Pixel Fill Rate 111 GP/s vs 64 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (47GP/s) 42% faster
Texture Fill Rate 277 GT/s vs 256 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (21GT/s) 8% faster
Floating Point Per Second 9 Flop/s vs 8 Flop/s (1Flop/s) 11% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Rise of the Tomb Raider 92 fps vs 53 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (39fps) 42% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65 fps vs 47 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (18fps) 28% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 94 fps vs 51 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (43fps) 46% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 96 fps vs 45 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (51fps) 53% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 102 fps vs 46 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (56fps) 55% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 82 fps vs 49 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (33fps) 40% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 68 fps vs 41 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (27fps) 40% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 81 fps vs 50 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (31fps) 38% more frames per second
CONS 4
Shading Units 2560 vs 4096 (1536) 38% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth 320 GB/s vs 512 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (192GB/s) 38% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 160 vs 256 (96) 38% less Texture Mapping Units
Graphics Card Power 180 Watts vs 175 Watts Power consumption is (5Watts) 3% higher
2nd Choice
6.9/10 Score 6081
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
Nvidia GTX 1050 Nvidia GTX 1050
vs
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti Nvidia GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
Nvidia Windforce 1080 Nvidia Windforce 1080
vs
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
Radeon R9 390X Radeon R9 390X
vs
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
Nvidia Rog Strix 1080 Nvidia Rog Strix 1080
vs
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
vs
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
AMD RX 560 AMD RX 560
vs
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
AMD RX 5600 XT AMD RX 5600 XT
vs
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti Nvidia Matrix 980 Ti
vs
Nvidia GTX 1080 Nvidia GTX 1080
Nvidia Xtreme 1060 Nvidia Xtreme 1060
vs