Search
Compare

Radeon R9 390 8GB 6Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card

3.3/10 Score 2962
Radeon R9 390 8GB 6Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
3.7/10 Score 3304
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 180
$ 380
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

2560

2816

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

1000 MHz

9% higher

1102 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

1000 MHz

16% higher

1190 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

8 GB

6 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

6 Gbps

14% higher

7 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

512 bit

384 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM
13% higher

384 GB/s

336 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

160

176

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

64

96

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

64 GP/s

44% higher

114 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

160 GT/s

23% higher

209 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

5 Flop/s

7 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

194 °F

198 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

275 Watts

9% lower

250 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

38 fps

31% higher

55 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

36 fps

31% higher

52 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

38 fps

30% higher

54 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

37 fps

33% higher

55 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

36 fps

40% higher

60 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

35 fps

38% higher

56 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

33 fps

11% higher

37 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

35 fps

36% higher

55 fps

Recommended
3.7/10 Score 3304
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 18
Shading Units 2816 vs 2560 (256) 9% more Shader Processing Units
GPU Clock 1102 MHz vs 1000 MHz Clock speed is (102MHz) 9% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1190 MHz vs 1000 MHz Boost clock speed is (190MHz) 16% higher
Memory Speed 7 Gbps vs 6 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (1Gbps) 14% faster
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 176 vs 160 (16) 9% more Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP) 96 vs 64 (32) 33% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 114 GP/s vs 64 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (50GP/s) 44% faster
Texture Fill Rate 209 GT/s vs 160 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (49GT/s) 23% faster
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 5 Flop/s (2Flop/s) 29% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Graphics Card Power 250 Watts vs 275 Watts Power consumption is (25Watts) 9% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider 55 fps vs 38 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (17fps) 31% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52 fps vs 36 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (16fps) 31% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 54 fps vs 38 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (16fps) 30% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 55 fps vs 37 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (18fps) 33% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 60 fps vs 36 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (24fps) 40% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 56 fps vs 35 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (21fps) 38% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 37 fps vs 33 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (4fps) 11% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 55 fps vs 35 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (20fps) 36% more frames per second
CONS 2
Memory Capacity 6 GB vs 8 GB (2GB) 25% less VRAM Capacity
Memory Bandwidth 336 GB/s vs 384 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (48GB/s) 13% slower
2nd Choice
3.3/10 Score 2962
Radeon R9 390 8GB 6Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 390 8GB 6Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 1070 Ti Nvidia GTX 1070 Ti
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 960 Nvidia GTX 960
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 1660 Nvidia GTX 1660
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia EVGA GTX 1060 Nvidia EVGA GTX 1060
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia RTX 4090 Nvidia RTX 4090
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia RTX 3070 Nvidia RTX 3070
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia RTX 3060 Nvidia RTX 3060
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti
vs