Search
Compare

Radeon R9 280 3GB 5Gbps 384-bit 200W Desktop Graphic card Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB 3GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card

2.6/10 Score 2326
Radeon R9 280 3GB 5Gbps 384-bit 200W Desktop Graphic card
3.5/10 Score 3084
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB 3GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 130
$ 200
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

16 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

1792

1152

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

827 MHz

45% higher

1506 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

933 MHz

45% higher

1708 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

3 GB

3 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

5 Gbps

38% higher

8 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

384 bit

192 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM
20% higher

240 GB/s

192 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

112

72

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

32

48

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

30 GP/s

63% higher

82 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

105 GT/s

15% higher

123 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

3 Flop/s

4 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

194 °F

201 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

200 Watts

40% lower

120 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

31 fps

35% higher

48 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

32 fps

18% higher

39 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

27 fps

40% higher

45 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

28 fps

38% higher

45 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

27 fps

44% higher

48 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

25 fps

40% higher

42 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

25 fps

19% higher

31 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

31 fps

28% higher

43 fps

Recommended
3.5/10 Score 3084
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB 3GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB 3GB 8Gbps 192-bit 120W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 17
GPU Architecture 16 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (12nm) 43% smaller
GPU Clock 1506 MHz vs 827 MHz Clock speed is (679MHz) 45% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1708 MHz vs 933 MHz Boost clock speed is (775MHz) 45% higher
Memory Speed 8 Gbps vs 5 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (3Gbps) 38% faster
Render Output Unit (ROP) 48 vs 32 (16) 33% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 82 GP/s vs 30 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (52GP/s) 63% faster
Texture Fill Rate 123 GT/s vs 105 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (18GT/s) 15% faster
Floating Point Per Second 4 Flop/s vs 3 Flop/s (1Flop/s) 25% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Graphics Card Power 120 Watts vs 200 Watts Power consumption is (80Watts) 40% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider 48 fps vs 31 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (17fps) 35% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39 fps vs 32 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (7fps) 18% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 45 fps vs 27 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (18fps) 40% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 45 fps vs 28 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (17fps) 38% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 48 fps vs 27 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (21fps) 44% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 42 fps vs 25 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (17fps) 40% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 31 fps vs 25 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (6fps) 19% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 43 fps vs 31 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (12fps) 28% more frames per second
CONS 3
Shading Units 1152 vs 1792 (640) 36% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth 192 GB/s vs 240 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (48GB/s) 20% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 72 vs 112 (40) 36% less Texture Mapping Units
2nd Choice
2.6/10 Score 2326
Radeon R9 280 3GB 5Gbps 384-bit 200W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 280 3GB 5Gbps 384-bit 200W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
Radeon R9 FURY X Radeon R9 FURY X
vs
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia JetStream 1070 Nvidia JetStream 1070
vs
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia GTX 980 Nvidia GTX 980
vs
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
vs
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia GTX 780 Nvidia GTX 780
vs
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia RTX 4090 Nvidia RTX 4090
vs
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
Radeon R9 280 Radeon R9 280
vs
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia GTX 1070 Ti Nvidia GTX 1070 Ti
vs
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
Radeon RX 470 Radeon RX 470
vs
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
vs