Search
Compare

Nvidia GTX 760 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 170W Desktop Graphic card Radeon R9 290 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card

2.4/10 Score 2088
Nvidia GTX 760 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 170W Desktop Graphic card
3/10 Score 2683
Radeon R9 290 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 140
$ 180
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

1152

2560

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second
3% higher

980 MHz

947 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance
8% higher

1033 MHz

947 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

2 GB

4 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data
17% higher

6 Gbps

5 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

256 bit

512 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

192 GB/s

40% higher

320 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

96

160

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

32

64

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

33 GP/s

46% higher

61 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

99 GT/s

35% higher

152 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

2 Flop/s

5 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

207 °F

194 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board
38% lower

170 Watts

275 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

22 fps

33% higher

33 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

24 fps

25% higher

32 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

27 fps

16% higher

32 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

29 fps

12% higher

33 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

28 fps

3% higher

29 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

23 fps

18% higher

28 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

24 fps

20% higher

30 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

24 fps

27% higher

33 fps

Recommended
3/10 Score 2683
Radeon R9 290 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 290 4GB 5Gbps 512-bit 275W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 16
Shading Units 2560 vs 1152 (1408) 55% more Shader Processing Units
Memory Capacity 4 GB vs 2 GB (2GB) 50% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Bandwidth 320 GB/s vs 192 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (128GB/s) 40% faster
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 160 vs 96 (64) 40% more Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP) 64 vs 32 (32) 50% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 61 GP/s vs 33 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (28GP/s) 46% faster
Texture Fill Rate 152 GT/s vs 99 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (53GT/s) 35% faster
Floating Point Per Second 5 Flop/s vs 2 Flop/s (3Flop/s) 60% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Rise of the Tomb Raider 33 fps vs 22 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (11fps) 33% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32 fps vs 24 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (8fps) 25% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 32 fps vs 27 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (5fps) 16% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 33 fps vs 29 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (4fps) 12% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 29 fps vs 28 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (1fps) 3% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 28 fps vs 23 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (5fps) 18% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 30 fps vs 24 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (6fps) 20% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 33 fps vs 24 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (9fps) 27% more frames per second
CONS 4
GPU Clock 947 MHz vs 980 MHz Clock speed is (33MHz) 3% lower
GPU Boost Clock 947 MHz vs 1033 MHz Boost clock speed is (86MHz) 8% lower
Memory Speed 5 Gbps vs 6 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (1Gbps) 17% slower
Graphics Card Power 275 Watts vs 170 Watts Power consumption is (105Watts) 38% higher
2nd Choice
2.4/10 Score 2088
Nvidia GTX 760 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 170W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX 760 2GB 6Gbps 256-bit 170W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Nvidia GTX Titan Black Nvidia GTX Titan Black
vs
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Nvidia GTX Titan Black Nvidia GTX Titan Black
vs
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB
vs
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Nvidia TITAN Xp Nvidia TITAN Xp
vs
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti
vs
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Nvidia GTX TITAN X Nvidia GTX TITAN X
vs
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
vs
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
vs
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Nvidia RTX 2060 Nvidia RTX 2060
vs
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER
vs