Search
Compare

Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card Nvidia GTX 780 3GB 6Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card

3.1/10 Score 2793
Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card
2.8/10 Score 2509
Nvidia GTX 780 3GB 6Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 150
$ 180
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

12 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

896

2304

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second
42% higher

1485 MHz

863 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance
46% higher

1665 MHz

900 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

4 GB

3 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data
25% higher

8 Gbps

6 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

128 bit

384 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM

128 GB/s

56% higher

288 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

56

192

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

32

48

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second
19% higher

53 GP/s

43 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

93 GT/s

46% higher

173 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

3 Flop/s

4 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

203 °F

203 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board
70% lower

75 Watts

250 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
43% higher

47 fps

27 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p
11% higher

38 fps

34 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p
10% higher

39 fps

35 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p
5% higher

38 fps

36 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

35 fps

3% higher

36 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p
33% higher

39 fps

26 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p
16% higher

37 fps

31 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p
8% higher

36 fps

33 fps

Recommended
3.1/10 Score 2793
Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX 1650 4GB 8Gbps 128-bit 75W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 14
GPU Architecture 12 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (16nm) 57% smaller
GPU Clock 1485 MHz vs 863 MHz Clock speed is (622MHz) 42% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1665 MHz vs 900 MHz Boost clock speed is (765MHz) 46% higher
Memory Capacity 4 GB vs 3 GB (1GB) 25% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 8 Gbps vs 6 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (2Gbps) 25% faster
Pixel Fill Rate 53 GP/s vs 43 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (10GP/s) 19% faster
Graphics Card Power 75 Watts vs 250 Watts Power consumption is (175Watts) 70% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider 47 fps vs 27 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (20fps) 43% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38 fps vs 34 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (4fps) 11% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 39 fps vs 35 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (4fps) 10% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 38 fps vs 36 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (2fps) 5% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 39 fps vs 26 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (13fps) 33% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 37 fps vs 31 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (6fps) 16% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 36 fps vs 33 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (3fps) 8% more frames per second
CONS 7
Shading Units 896 vs 2304 (1408) 61% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth 128 GB/s vs 288 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (160GB/s) 56% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 56 vs 192 (136) 71% less Texture Mapping Units
Render Output Unit (ROP) 32 vs 48 (16) 33% less Render Output Units
Texture Fill Rate 93 GT/s vs 173 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (80GT/s) 46% slower
Floating Point Per Second 3 Flop/s vs 4 Flop/s (1Flop/s) 25% less Floating Point Operations per minute
Battlefield 1 35 fps vs 36 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (1fps) 3% less frames per second
2nd Choice
2.8/10 Score 2509
Nvidia GTX 780 3GB 6Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX 780 3GB 6Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
vs
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER Nvidia RTX 2060 SUPER
vs
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
Nvidia GTX 950 Nvidia GTX 950
vs
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
vs
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti Nvidia GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
AMD RX 580 AMD RX 580
vs
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
AMD RX 590 AMD RX 590
vs
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
Nvidia EVGA GTX 1070 Nvidia EVGA GTX 1070
vs
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
Nvidia RTX 3080 Nvidia RTX 3080
vs
Nvidia GTX 1650 Nvidia GTX 1650
Radeon R9 380X Radeon R9 380X
vs