Search
Compare

Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card

6.9/10 Score 6081
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
3.7/10 Score 3304
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 180
$ 380
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

28 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

4096

2816

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

1000 MHz

9% higher

1102 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

1000 MHz

16% higher

1190 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

4 GB

6 GB

Memory Type

HBM

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

1 Gbps

86% higher

7 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

4096 bit

384 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM
34% higher

512 GB/s

336 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

256

176

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

64

96

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

64 GP/s

44% higher

114 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second
18% higher

256 GT/s

209 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

8 Flop/s

7 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

194 °F

198 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board
30% lower

175 Watts

250 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

53 fps

4% higher

55 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

47 fps

10% higher

52 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

51 fps

6% higher

54 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

45 fps

18% higher

55 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

46 fps

23% higher

60 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

49 fps

13% higher

56 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p
10% higher

41 fps

37 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

50 fps

9% higher

55 fps

Recommended
3.7/10 Score 3304
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 13
GPU Clock 1102 MHz vs 1000 MHz Clock speed is (102MHz) 9% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1190 MHz vs 1000 MHz Boost clock speed is (190MHz) 16% higher
Memory Capacity 6 GB vs 4 GB (2GB) 33% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 7 Gbps vs 1 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (6Gbps) 86% faster
Render Output Unit (ROP) 96 vs 64 (32) 33% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 114 GP/s vs 64 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (50GP/s) 44% faster
Rise of the Tomb Raider 55 fps vs 53 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (2fps) 4% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52 fps vs 47 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (5fps) 10% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 54 fps vs 51 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (3fps) 6% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 55 fps vs 45 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (10fps) 18% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 60 fps vs 46 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (14fps) 23% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 56 fps vs 49 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (7fps) 13% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 55 fps vs 50 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (5fps) 9% more frames per second
CONS 7
Shading Units 2816 vs 4096 (1280) 31% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth 336 GB/s vs 512 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (176GB/s) 34% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 176 vs 256 (80) 31% less Texture Mapping Units
Texture Fill Rate 209 GT/s vs 256 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (47GT/s) 18% slower
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 8 Flop/s (1Flop/s) 13% less Floating Point Operations per minute
Graphics Card Power 250 Watts vs 175 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 30% higher
Assassin's Creed Unity 37 fps vs 41 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (4fps) 10% less frames per second
2nd Choice
6.9/10 Score 6081
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Radeon R9 NANO 4GB 1Gbps 4096-bit 175W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 780 Nvidia GTX 780
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Radeon R9 390X Radeon R9 390X
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 980 Ti Nvidia GTX 980 Ti
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX 980 Ti Nvidia GTX 980 Ti
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Radeon R9 290X Radeon R9 290X
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia GTX Titan Black Nvidia GTX Titan Black
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia RTX 3060 Nvidia RTX 3060
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
AMD RX 5600 AMD RX 5600
vs
Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti Nvidia EVGA GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
vs